Dongchedi

A recent Chinese autonomous driving assist system test by Dongchedi, involving 36 vehicles, has sparked controversy and conspiracy theories. The test revealed limitations, even in Tesla’s systems, and polarized reactions. Some criticize the methodology, while others allege bias, suggesting a foreign-backed plot to undermine Chinese automakers and delay Level 3 standards. Skeptics dismiss these claims, viewing the test as highlighting real-world limitations. More balanced views see the controversy as a necessary step towards accurately representing autonomous driving capabilities and avoiding public misinformation.

A recent Dongchedi test of 36 vehicles across 20+ brands revealed shortcomings in current driver-assistance technologies. Simulated accident scenarios, particularly those involving highway hazards, yielded a pass rate below 50%, raising safety concerns. The results have sparked online debate, with accusations of bias against Dongchedi. Former Meizu executive Li Nan cautioned against making such accusations without concrete evidence, emphasizing the importance of fair interpretation of motives.

A recent assisted driving test by Dongchedi, involving 36 vehicles in simulated accident scenarios, revealed limitations in current systems. While Tesla performed best, no vehicle flawlessly navigated all tests. Chinese systems, including Huawei’s, fared worse. The test sparked debate about methodology but highlights that even advanced features remain assistive, not autonomous. Official media emphasize inherent risks, with dealerships shifting to a “hands-on, eyes-on” marketing approach. Experts stress that drivers must remain attentive and understand the limitations of Level 2 assisted driving systems.