Driver Responsibility
-
The Point of Your Rant? A Warning from DCD’s Botched Test of Chinese ADAS: Don’t Blindly Trust Driver-Assistance Systems.
A recent assisted driving test by Dongchedi, involving 36 vehicles in simulated accident scenarios, revealed limitations in current systems. While Tesla performed best, no vehicle flawlessly navigated all tests. Chinese systems, including Huawei’s, fared worse. The test sparked debate about methodology but highlights that even advanced features remain assistive, not autonomous. Official media emphasize inherent risks, with dealerships shifting to a “hands-on, eyes-on” marketing approach. Experts stress that drivers must remain attentive and understand the limitations of Level 2 assisted driving systems.
-
L2 Requires Constant Driver Attention: Experts Stress Assisted Driving is Not Autonomous, Accidents Are Not the Automaker’s Responsibility
Automakers promote ADAS, but experts stress these Level 2 systems are driver *aids*, not autonomous replacements. Drivers must remain engaged, bearing responsibility for accidents unless product defects are proven. Simulations revealed ADAS failures in critical scenarios: only 47% of vehicles avoided a highway collision with a truck obstruction at night, and only 58% stopped for a child darting into the road. V2X integration is seen as the future beyond current L2 limitations.
