Online Debate

A restroom sign on a Chinese high-speed train, urging users to flip up the toilet seat, has sparked a gender equality debate online. Female netizens argue the sign implies standing urination as the norm, unfairly burdening those who require a seated position. Others view it as a practical hygiene measure. The controversy highlights sensitivity around gender roles and the potential for misinterpretations, raising questions about legitimate grievances versus overreactions on social media.

a

Dalian University of Technology is considering expelling a student, Li Xinshi, for “inappropriate behavior” involving a relationship with a Ukrainian CS player, Zeus. The university cites regulations against “improper interactions with foreigners.” The case, sparked by a leaked photo, has ignited online debate, with some supporting the university’s stance for upholding morals and others criticizing the harshness of potential expulsion and the public disclosure of Li’s name. Critics argue that the university’s actions could damage her future prospects. The situation prompts a discussion on student rights versus institutional authority.

Former Meizu executive Li Nan sparked debate on CNBC AI News by criticizing the extremist elements within Xiaomi and Huawei fanbases. He observed that Huawei’s most extreme fans display poorer conduct, often deploying nationalistic arguments and resembling “coal barons.” Discussions evolved to include classifications of fans and their motivations, with Li Nan favoring the “stupid but poor” scenario for maximizing readers’ happiness.