“`html
CNBC AI News reported on July 14th, that a Ukrainian professional CS player, known as Zeus, shared a photo in his fan group last December, suggesting a relationship with a Chinese woman. At the time, both individuals were reportedly not single. Online sleuths identified the woman as a student at Dalian University of Technology.
Dalian University of Technology’s Student Affairs Department recently published a notice on their website, “Announcement on Proposed Expulsion of Student Li Xinshi,” citing “inappropriate behavior” on December 16, 2024, which allegedly caused “a negative impact.” The proposed disciplinary action stems from Article 19, Section 6 of the university’s disciplinary regulations, which stipulates that students engaging in “improper interactions with foreigners, damaging the country’s or university’s reputation,” may face penalties ranging from a demerit to expulsion.
The case has ignited heated debate online. Supporters of the university’s stance argue that Li’s actions involve not only an inappropriate relationship but also indirectly reinforce negative stereotypes against Chinese women in the international online community, potentially contributing to their stigmatization. They maintain that expulsion is a necessary measure to uphold school discipline and social morals.
Conversely, critics contend that while Li’s behavior may be morally questionable, she is also a victim of the malicious dissemination of private videos. They argue that the university’s proposed punishment is excessively harsh, potentially derailing her future prospects.
Some domestic media outlets have characterized Dalian University of Technology’s approach as overly and unusually direct.
The university’s announcement explicitly names Li Xinshi in both the title and body of the notice. Given the irreversible impact of disclosing a student’s full name, especially during the preliminary stage of disciplinary proceedings, critics argue the university should have exercised greater caution, as the proposed punishment is not yet final. The debate showcases the inherent tension between transparency and protecting an individual’s reputation during sensitive situations.
Furthermore, even if the university proceeds with the expulsion after considering Li’s defense, she retains the right to appeal the decision through administrative review or legal action. The implications extend beyond a single disciplinary case, prompting a wider discussion on student rights versus institutional authority.
The university’s decision to fully disclose Li’s name at this early stage raises concerns about the potentially irreversible impact on her future academic, professional, and personal life, a decision that warrants careful consideration. Observers suggest the university could have adopted a more nuanced or circumspect approach to address the matter.
It’s worth noting that Chinese law stipulates that foreigners who commit crimes within China or engage in criminal or tortious acts against Chinese citizens are also subject to legal accountability. The law should protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, and any act of maliciously disseminating private videos or making inappropriate remarks demands a thorough investigation and prosecution to uphold the authority and dignity of “equality before the law.” The case highlights the complex interplay of personal conduct, institutional regulations, and legal frameworks.
What are your thoughts on this developing story?
“`
Original article, Author: Tobias. If you wish to reprint this article, please indicate the source:https://aicnbc.com/4643.html
