Lawsuit

Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman is intensifying, centering on accusations that the AI company has abandoned its non-profit mission for commercial interests, particularly following Microsoft’s significant investment. Musk’s legal team is examining financial contributions and the use of donor funds, while OpenAI’s counsel questioned Musk on his involvement and xAI’s use of OpenAI technologies. The trial seeks to clarify OpenAI’s foundational purpose and its evolution.

Elon Musk is suing OpenAI, alleging the AI company has abandoned its nonprofit mission for commercial gain, particularly through its Microsoft partnership. Musk testified he invested expecting altruistic AI development, not a multi-billion dollar enterprise, and objects to founders profiting. OpenAI counters that its for-profit arm is necessary for funding ambitious AI goals. The trial could set a precedent for AI governance and commercialization.

Jury selection is underway in Oakland for the Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial. Musk accuses OpenAI of betraying its nonprofit mission, seeking reversal of its restructuring. The jury will determine liability, with the judge making the final decision. The trial’s outcome holds significant implications for two tech giants valued collectively over $2 trillion.

Jury selection begins in the lawsuit filed by Elon Musk against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Musk alleges OpenAI reneged on its nonprofit founding promise. OpenAI, now a for-profit entity valued at over $850 billion, disputes the claims as baseless. The trial, overseen by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, will determine liability and potential remedies. Key figures are expected to testify.

xAI, Elon Musk’s AI company, faces a lawsuit from the NAACP accusing it of violating the Clean Air Act by using natural gas turbines without permits for its data centers near Memphis. The NAACP alleges these operations emit harmful pollutants, disproportionately affecting nearby Black communities. Parallel to this, xAI’s AI chatbot, Grok, is under scrutiny for generating explicit content, including non-consensual images, drawing global regulatory attention.

Elon Musk’s legal team is seeking the removal of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman from their positions, along with a return to OpenAI’s nonprofit status. Musk alleges fraud, claiming he was deceived into donating $38 million based on promises of a nonprofit structure. OpenAI denies these claims, calling the lawsuit a harassment campaign driven by ego and a desire to slow down a competitor. The dispute stems from Musk’s co-founding of OpenAI and his subsequent departure, intensified by his current role in a competing AI company.

OpenAI has accused Elon Musk of anti-competitive tactics and urged investigations ahead of a high-stakes trial. The AI company claims Musk has coordinated “attacks” against it, potentially including collaboration with Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg. This dispute arises from Musk’s past involvement and subsequent lawsuit alleging manipulation as OpenAI shifted to a for-profit model. OpenAI fears Musk’s actions aim to seize control of AGI’s future, diverting it from safety-focused entities to competitors. The trial’s jury selection begins April 27.

A Jeffrey Epstein survivor has filed a class-action lawsuit against the Trump administration and Google, alleging wrongful disclosure of victim information by the Justice Department and its subsequent republication by Google’s AI. The suit challenges Section 230 protections, arguing AI’s role in disseminating sensitive data causes renewed trauma and harassment. This action coincides with other AI-related scrutiny of Google and raises questions about platform accountability and potential legislative changes to Section 230.

The National PTA is ending its partnership with Meta due to the social media company’s ongoing child safety legal battles. The PTA will not renew funding for its digital safety initiative with Meta in 2026. This decision comes as Meta faces lawsuits alleging it misled the public about app safety and failed to protect children from predators. Advocacy groups support the PTA’s move and urge them to review other “Big Tech” partnerships.

A Miami judge upheld a $243 million verdict against Tesla following a fatal 2019 Autopilot crash. The ruling denies Tesla’s bid to overturn the jury’s decision, which found the company partially liable for the deaths and injuries caused when a Model S using Enhanced Autopilot accelerated into an intersection. This setback occurs as Tesla pushes into the competitive autonomous vehicle market, facing challenges in establishing its robotaxi services.