Tesla

Tesla’s board proposes a new compensation plan potentially worth $900 billion for Elon Musk, contingent on achieving ambitious market cap and operational targets over the next decade, including reaching an $8.5 trillion market capitalization and delivering 20 million vehicles. If achieved, Musk’s ownership could double. This aims to retain Musk and prioritize Tesla, focusing on autonomous driving, robotaxis, and robots, shifting away from a solely EV-centric model. Success hinges on navigating strategic transitions and competition, amid concerns about inter-company transactions and potential conflicts of interest.

Tesla is seeking shareholder approval for a new CEO compensation package for Elon Musk, following a court invalidation of his 2018 pay plan, deemed excessive. The proposal includes stock options vesting upon achieving ambitious market capitalization and operational milestones, aiming to incentivize Musk and grant him increased voting power. Tesla also proposes investing in Musk’s AI venture, xAI, raising conflict-of-interest concerns. The timing coincides with an ongoing legal battle regarding the 2018 package, adding complexity to executive compensation practices and corporate governance.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk predicts the company’s Optimus robots will drive 80% of its future value, potentially reaching a $25 trillion valuation. Facing challenges with EV competition and public perception, Musk aims to shift focus to AI-powered robotaxis and humanoid robots. While Tesla is on track to produce 5,000 Optimus robots in 2025 and deploy them in factories, it trails competitors like Waymo, Unitree and Boston Dynamics in both robotaxi and humanoid robot markets. A recent leadership change in Tesla’s robotics division adds further complexity. Optimus is envisioned as a versatile robot for various tasks.

Tesla is challenging a $242.5 million verdict in a product liability and wrongful death suit stemming from a fatal 2019 Autopilot crash in Key Largo, Florida. The company requests the court overturn the verdict or grant a new trial, arguing the damages are excessive and challenging both compensatory and punitive awards. Tesla claims the driver’s negligence, not design defects, caused the accident where the Model S accelerated through an intersection, killing one and severely injuring another. The plaintiffs maintain Tesla’s Autopilot system’s misrepresentations contributed to the crash.

A recent survey indicates Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system may be deterring more U.S. buyers than attracting them, with nearly half believing FSD should be illegal. This comes as Tesla faces slowing sales, increased competition, and reputational damage from Musk’s actions. European sales are also down. While Musk sees FSD as a key advantage, Tesla lags in robotaxi development. Consumers desire clearer regulations and manufacturer accountability for automated vehicles. Tesla faces increasing concerns about safety and brand reputation, especially after recent legal setbacks.

Tesla’s European sales plummeted 40% in July, marking the seventh consecutive month of decline despite overall BEV market growth. Chinese competitor BYD surged with a 225% increase. Intensifying competition, potentially coupled with brand impact from Elon Musk’s public persona and ties to the Trump administration, are contributing factors. Tesla’s global performance faces scrutiny, with concerns about its aging vehicle lineup. BYD’s aggressive European expansion, capturing over 5% market share, intensifies the pressure on Tesla and legacy automakers.

Elon Musk has voiced concerns about losing control of Tesla, citing his current 12.8% stake as insufficient to secure his position, especially with the company’s future robotics focus. He refuted claims of using Tesla stock as loan collateral. Musk aims for a 25% share to maintain strategic influence, highlighting the impact of stock option taxation on his voting control. His apprehension stems from the possibility of being ousted by activist shareholders after Tesla produces “millions of robots.”

Tesla is reportedly shutting down its Dojo project, a move indicating a shift towards external partnerships for its AI needs. Head of Dojo, Peter Bannon, is expected to leave. Tesla plans to enhance collaborations with Nvidia and AMD for computing, and deepen its partnership with Samsung in chip manufacturing, evidenced by a $16.5 billion deal. Samsung will reportedly produce Tesla’s AI6 chip, while TSMC will manufacture the AI5. Tesla also plans to diversify Dojo’s supply chain, engaging Samsung and Intel for chip manufacturing and packaging.

Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk could receive a $30 billion stock grant, reigniting debate about his compensation. A Tesla engineer, Tsai, defended the award on X, noting Musk’s eight years without a salary, consistent work attendance, and leadership through crucial milestones. Tsai also humorously pointed out that his own salary once surpassed Musk’s. He emphasized Musk’s passion and commitment as a team motivator, hoping he receives his first paycheck after years of dedication. The stock package aims to align Musk’s interests with long-term shareholder value and ambitious growth targets.

Elon Musk announced on X that Tesla may enable in-car gaming while driving within 3-6 months, pending regulatory approval. This follows a video of a Tesla owner playing Grand Theft Auto using Full Self-Driving (FSD). While presenting a potential revenue stream via subscriptions, the plan faces significant regulatory hurdles due to safety concerns and driver distraction, even with FSD engaged. Tesla emphasizes that drivers must remain vigilant and ready to take control despite FSD.