July 18 – A new investigation reveals a potentially disturbing trend in the restaurant industry: “dine-in versus delivery double standards.” According to media reports, a recent probe involving visits to numerous restaurants found evidence suggesting that some establishments are treating their in-house and delivery customers quite differently.
The alleged disparities include using premium ingredients, such as freshly pressed peanut oil and freshly cut meat, for dine-in patrons, while resorting to cheaper alternatives like bulk-processed blended oil and frozen, pre-prepared meats for delivery orders. The investigation further claims that some restaurants are serving newly harvested rice to dine-in customers and older, less desirable rice in takeout meals.
The problem? The temporal and spatial separation between the dine-in and delivery experiences makes it difficult for consumers to compare quality directly, which complicates the matter of providing appropriate evidence and effectively pursuing complaints.
Industry insiders suggest that some businesses, perceiving a lack of direct oversight, may be opportunistically cutting costs and lowering standards. This, coupled with platform fees and delivery expenses, squeezes profit margins, leading some restaurants to compromise food quality. The underlying issue, analysts argue, is a lack of industry-wide regulation and oversight. The relative novelty of the food delivery business has created gaps in areas like ingredient traceability, production process monitoring, and packaging standards, paving the way for unscrupulous operators.
For long-term sustainability, restaurants must prioritize integrity and establish standardized procedures to ensure consistent quality and pricing between dine-in and delivery options. Delivery platforms also have a crucial role to play, including refining their review systems and promoting transparent business practices. One intriguing possibility is requiring restaurants to offer “live kitchen streams,” allowing customers to view chefs preparing meals in real-time before placing an order. Increased transparency of this kind can give consumers a more direct appreciation of the food preparation process.
Leveraging technology to promote “open and transparent kitchens” on online ordering platforms represents a significant opportunity. This approach could thoroughly safeguard consumer rights regarding information and oversight, injecting much-needed confidence into the food delivery ecosystem.
Original article, Author: Tobias. If you wish to reprint this article, please indicate the source:https://aicnbc.com/5080.html
