Consumers’ Report: Restaurants Using Frozen Meat for Delivery, Fresh Meat for Dine-In – A Double Standard?

Chinese consumers are increasingly criticizing restaurants for alleged “double standards,” using fresh ingredients for dine-in customers but cheaper, frozen substitutes for takeout orders. The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Rights Protection Committee (JSCRPC) argues this differential treatment violates consumer rights to fair dealing and transparent information. Key concerns include ingredient quality discrepancies, smaller takeout portions, and inflated delivery prices. The JSCRPC emphasizes that consumers deserve consistent quality regardless of consumption method, and experts warn against exploiting informational asymmetry, raising issues of transparency and ethical practices in the food delivery sector.

CNBC AI News, July 31st – A growing outcry is surfacing in China over the alleged “double standard” practices of some restaurants, where fresh ingredients are purportedly reserved for dine-in customers while frozen meats and cheaper substitutes are used for takeout orders.

The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Rights Protection Committee (JSCRPC) has weighed in on the issue, stating that core to the restaurant business is trust and fair dealing. The Committee argued that differential treatment based on consumption channel is unacceptable, and consumers’ right to clear and transparent information should never be compromised.

The JSCRPC highlights three key areas where this “double standard” manifests:

Ingredients: Restaurants are accused of using fresh, high-quality ingredients for customers dining in, while resorting to frozen alternatives or pre-prepared meals for delivery orders.

Portion Size: Takeout portions often appear to be significantly smaller than their dine-in counterparts.

Pricing: Menu prices on delivery platforms are frequently higher than those offered within the restaurant itself.

The JSCRPC maintains that regardless of whether a customer chooses to dine in or order out, upon payment, they are entitled to goods and services that align with the advertised standard. Differential treatment based solely on the consumption method is deemed unacceptable.

Experts suggest that exploiting informational asymmetry in this manner constitutes a violation of consumers’ rights to informed decision-making and fair trade. The situation raises pertinent questions about transparency, quality control, and ethical business practices within the rapidly expanding food delivery sector.

外卖用冻肉、堂食用鲜肉 消保委:商家不应玩“双标”

Original article, Author: Tobias. If you wish to reprint this article, please indicate the source:https://aicnbc.com/6095.html

Like (0)
Previous 1 day ago
Next 1 day ago

Related News