Shenzhen Traffic Authorities Warn Against Distracted Driving Following Richard Yu’s Controversy

A viral video showing Huawei’s Richard Yu briefly lowering his head while driving an AITO M8 SUV (Level 2 autonomy) reignited debates on driver-assistance system safety. Shenzhen authorities stressed drivers must remain attentive, with full liability for accidents during assisted operation. Huawei’s car unit and AITO reiterated Level 2 systems require continuous manual control. Analysts highlighted consumer confusion over ADAS limitations despite automakers’ marketing, as regulators globally warn these technologies demand constant supervision. The incident underscores risks of misaligned tech ambitions and lagging user education, with the autonomous vehicle market projected to hit $2.3T by 2030 amid regulatory challenges.

CNBC Tech Update | May 26 – Huawei’s consumer business chief, Richard Yu, found himself at the center of a heated debate about autonomous driving safety after viral footage showed him momentarily lowering his head for approximately 20 seconds while behind the wheel of the AITO M8 SUV, a flagship model under Huawei’s smart car division. The incident has reignited discussions about the ethical and regulatory boundaries of driver-assistance systems.

Video circulating on Chinese social media captured an onlooker shouting “Mr. Yu, are you asleep?” toward the moving vehicle, followed by audible honking. Yu, who also serves as Chairman of Huawei’s Intelligent Automotive Solutions unit, later rolled down the window to wave and smile at the camera, though the context of his gesture remained unclear.

Shenzhen traffic authorities issued a swift response to the controversy, stating: “Driver inattentiveness during assisted driving operations is strictly prohibited. Any accident occurring under such circumstances would hold the operator fully liable. The matter has been escalated for further investigation.” Separately, AITO’s customer service team emphasized: “The AITO M8 operates at Level 2 autonomy, which requires drivers to maintain manual control and visual awareness. The system includes alerts for distraction, but ultimate responsibility rests with the human operator.”

Industry Context: The episode underscores persistent confusion among consumers about the limitations of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS). While automakers like Tesla and Huawei aggressively market these features, regulatory bodies globally continue to stress that no commercially available system qualifies as fully autonomous. “This isn’t just about Huawei – it’s an industry-wide education challenge,” noted Shanghai-based mobility analyst Li Wei. “The gap between marketing language and technical reality creates dangerous misunderstandings.”

Global safety regulators have repeatedly warned that ADAS technologies like lane-keeping and adaptive cruise control require constant human supervision. Recent data from the China Insurance Automotive Safety Index reveals that over 40% of drivers using ADAS systems admit to becoming “complacent” during operation, despite system warnings.


Footage of Shenzhen traffic incident involving Huawei executive

The Bottom Line: As automakers race to deploy increasingly sophisticated ADAS features, this incident serves as a stark reminder that technological ambition must be tempered by user education. With the global autonomous vehicle market projected to reach $2.3 trillion by 2030 according to McKinsey, regulatory frameworks and corporate accountability mechanisms appear to be struggling to keep pace with innovation.

Original article, Author: Tobias. If you wish to reprint this article, please indicate the source:https://aicnbc.com/974.html

Like (0)
Previous 2025年5月26日 am2:45
Next 2025年5月26日 am4:08

Related News